You are here

Cascade Institute

Subscribe to Cascade Institute feed Cascade Institute
Research Centre at Royal Roads University
Updated: 4 days 4 hours ago

Thomas Homer-Dixon delivers Victoria Forum plenary on polycrisis and hope

Tue, 09/01/2026 - 06:18

In a column published Aug. 30 in the Victoria Times Colonist, public health expert Trevor Hancock reported on the Cascade Institute’s latest polycrisis findings, presented by Thomas Homer-Dixon in the opening plenary of this year’s Victoria Forum.

The forum, hosted jointly by the Senate of Canada, the University of Victoria and Royal Roads University, paired Homer-Dixon with Dr. Courtney Howard of the Global Climate and Health Alliance. Hancock frames the polycrisis through Rittel and Webber’s classic definition of a “wicked problem” — one that defies complete definition and for which no final solution exists — and argues that wicked problems call for what he calls virtuous solutions, rooted in a commitment to the public good.

Hancock reports the Polycrisis Core Model’s central result: of the stable global scenarios the model identifies for 2040, eight are as bad as or worse than today, with deterioration the most likely outcome and collapse the second most likely. Of the better futures, one is a high-tech autocracy and the remaining one is the Hope Attractor — which, as Homer-Dixon told the forum, is “not simply a speculative or aspirational future,” but “a scientifically grounded basis for honest hope.”

Review the presentation deck, “Pathways to the Hope Attractor.”

Read the full article in the Times Colonist.

The post Thomas Homer-Dixon delivers Victoria Forum plenary on polycrisis and hope appeared first on Cascade Institute.
Categories: G1. Progressive Green

How stiff is Canada’s spine? A poll suggests we may be ready to sustain the costs of our newfound defiance

Mon, 08/31/2026 - 10:15

Thomas Homer-Dixon and Toby Shannan

The version of record of this op-ed appeared in The Globe and Mail.

Full Environics Research polling data, summary and highlights, and methodological details are available here.

After the breakdown of trade negotiations between Canada and the United States, Canadians across the political spectrum are rallying round the Maple Leaf. But we’re still in the confrontation’s early stage, where outrage feels good and comes easily. The true costs will come later.

Current polls of our attitudes may mislead. Dopamine flows in pulses. Foreboding and second thoughts may well follow our current high, as prices for tariffed products climb, national and provincial debts soar, and tens of thousands of good jobs vanish.

To really gauge Canadians’ commitment to resistance, regardless of our potential foe, we need data that capture our deeper, more enduring sentiments. New evidence suggests we may indeed be ready to sustain the costs of our newfound defiance.

Continue reading. 

 

The post How stiff is Canada’s spine? A poll suggests we may be ready to sustain the costs of our newfound defiance appeared first on Cascade Institute.
Categories: G1. Progressive Green

The Fine Print I:

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.

Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.

The Fine Print II:

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.

It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.